Hi all,
Hey fellas let's not get our knickers in a twist over this and look at the facts!
Sorry Rob, I have to agree with Peter somewhat on this.
I certainly don't think it's 'petty' if it means that other lead players miss out on playing because one lead player does two sets.
I guess you volunteered to do Mark's set because no one else has offered to do so yet and time is getting short.
However, we potentially have 15 lead players who may all want to play, and there are still some lead players who haven't put sets in yet. Maybe one of those players would like to play with Mark. (You have until Thursday fellas)
So far we have 8 sets, including Mark's, for this month. However the 'closing date' for sets isn't until next Thursday so there could be more.
So perhaps you should say that 'if no one else offers to play with Mark you will do the set with him'. That way you leave the possibility of another lead player using Mark in his set. If there are less than 11 sets I don't have a problem with anyone doing 'extras' or sharing them.
See the article on set procedures in the 'Financial Members Only' forum.
Let's all play it cool and be fair please.
Regards,
BarryF